Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Please carefully read the following article:
Cho, I., Berry, C. M., Payne, S. C.
Please carefully read the following article:
Cho, I., Berry, C. M., Payne, S. C., & Lee, P. (2022). Too good to be true? Are supervisor-perspective ratings a valid substitute for actual supervisor ratings?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(1), 167-178.
Please use a minimum of 5 scholarly sources as references to support or refute your points of view regarding this paper.
Please answer the following questions in THREE pages or less (minus cover and references):
Why was the study necessary?
How did the data glean from this study improve or grow the knowledge base within the field of IO Psychology?
What was the methodology used by the researchers?
How does this study contribute/relate to the comparison of assessments generated by the self versus those generated by others (raters/observers)?
Critique their approach to meta-analysis relating to the decisions made in the inclusion/exclusion of studies.
Why is it important to be able to critique a meta-analysis such as this one?
This is Article number 5: Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2009). A quantitative review of the relationship between person-organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 389-399.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.