Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Select two models used in clinical social work supervision and write a 5-6 page
Select two models used in clinical social work supervision and write a 5-6 page (maximum) essay that addresses the following questions:
According to the scholarly literature, what are the primary components of each model?
According to the scholarly literature, what do the models have in common?
According to the scholarly literature, how do the models differ from one another?
According to the scholarly literature, what knowledge and skills does a supervisor need to know/have to use this model competently?
What does the scholarly literature say about the benefits and risks of each model? In addition to the scholarly literature, you may add your own perspective here.
What does the scholarly literature say about the effectiveness of each model? In addition to the scholarly literature, you may add your own perspective here.
Remember that this paper is about clinical supervision in social work. Models refers to types of specific supervisory approaches (eg, relational, reflective, trauma-informed etc.) not the general functions of supervision (administrative, educational, supportive). You might want to check with your professor to make sure you have selected two acceptable social work models to compare.
You are required to have a minimum of two scholarly references about each model. One of these articles for each model may come from the required reading list for the course. Please use APA style for your essay and references. Use subheadings to organize your essay (do not simply repeat the questions listed above).
Be sure to include citations from the articles in every section. Please minimize the number of direct quotes you use in this short paper. There should be no more than one per page (none are required). It is always better to paraphrase and summarize to show your understanding of the material.
Compare/Contrast Supervision Models
Compare/Contrast Supervision Models
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrimary Components of Models
16 pts
Student has clearly identified the primary components of both supervision models selected.
13 pts
Student has identified some of the primary components of both supervision models selected or information about one model is missing detail.
10 pts
Student identification of the primary components of one or both supervision models selected does not show understanding.
0 pts
The identification of the primary components of the models is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSimilarities
16 pts
Student has clearly identified the primary similarities of both supervision models selected.
13 pts
Student has identified some of the similarities of both supervision models selected or information about one model is missing detail.
10 pts
Student identification of the similarities of one or both supervision models selected does not show understanding.
0 pts
The identification of the similarities of the models is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDifferences
16 pts
Student has clearly identified the primary differences of both supervision models selected.
13 pts
Student has identified some of the differences of both supervision models selected or information about one model is missing detail.
10 pts
Student identification of the differences of one or both supervision models selected does not show understanding.
0 pts
The identification of the differences of the models is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKnowledge and Skills Required to use Model
16 pts
Student has clearly identified the primary knowledge and skills required in both supervision models selected.
13 pts
Student has identified some of the knowledge and skills required in both supervision models selected or information about one model is missing detail.
10 pts
Student identification of the knowledge and skills required in one or both supervision models selected does not show understanding.
0 pts
The identification of the knowledge and skills required in the models is missing.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBenefits and Risks
8 pts
Student has clearly identified the benefits and risks of using each supervision model.
6 pts
Student has identified some benefits and risks for each supervision model or information about one model is missing or lacks detail.
4 pts
Student information about the benefits and risks of each model lacks understanding.
0 pts
The benefits and risks of each supervision model is not addressed in this paper.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffectiveness
8 pts
Student has clearly identified the effectiveness of using each supervision model.
6 pts
Student has identified some aspects of the effectiveness for each supervision model or information about one model is missing or lacks detail.
4 pts
Student information about the effectiveness of each model lacks understanding.
0 pts
The effectiveness of each supervision model is not addressed in this paper.
8 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Communication
20 pts
Written work is free from grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors and uses correct APA citation style.
16 pts
Written work includes minor grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (6-10) and/or has some errors in APA citation style.
14 pts
Written work includes minor grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (10-15) and/or has some errors in APA citation style.
0 pts
Written work contains numerous grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors (more than 15) and/or has numerous errors in APA citation style.
20 pts
Total Points: 100
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.