Regarding the “London Bridge Attack,” ( https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50870309 ) d

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now

Regarding the “London Bridge Attack,” ( https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50870309 ) d

Regarding the “London Bridge Attack,” ( https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50870309 ) draw on what you learned in the “Constraints” reading and answer the following: Why is Darryn Frost morally permitted (i.e., apart from the law) to threaten Usman Khan with a weapon, but Khan is not morally permitted to a) initially attack other people on the bridge and b) to threaten Frost once Frost points the narwhal tusk at Khan?
Analyze the “Per Diem” reading using what you learned in the “Constraints” reading. 
Explain why it is or why it is not a morally “big deal” to claim five full days of per diem when the regulations indicate that you should report three full days.
Test whether or not you are violating someone’s rights by reporting five full days. According to government regulations, you are technically misreporting your expenses by reporting five full days. Apply the “universalization” test: If every government employee planned to misreport his or her travel expenses, and everyone knew that everyone planned to misreport, would everyone still get paid the “extra” money she or he wants? In other words, would this plan work if everyone was up front about planning to claim more money than the regulations say he or she deserves?
Apply the “mere means” test. The comptroller for your cost center, Sandra Diaz, reviews all expense reports and issues payments. Are you using her as a mere means—a tool, a thing—to get what you want if you report five full days instead of three? Explain. Are you giving her a chance to agree to pay you for either three or five full days by giving her all the information about your travel schedule and letting her make a decision about what you deserve? Mrs. Diaz issues payments that come from Americans’ taxes. Are you using the U.S. taxpayers as a mere means to accomplish some goal if you report five full days on your report?
So, considering constraints alone (we will look at the other elements in the MDR later), does falsifying the expense report appear to be morally permissible (you may do it), mandatory (you must do it), or prohibited (you must not do it)?
Guidelines and Requirements 
This assignment is worth 200 points.
Your essay should be a minimum of 750 words.
You will be graded according to the Written Assignment Rubric located in the Details & Information panel on the right.
Format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, and double-spaced.
Ensure your essay has a dedicated introduction, conclusion, and references/citations as required.
Be sure to follow Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition for citations. For more information on Chicago Style, refer to the Marine Corps University’s Style Guide1 or the Purdue OWL Writing Lab2 website.
Do not use any material outside of the course unless the sources are approved by your instructor.
Please submit your paper as a Microsoft Word document by placing the cursor in the text box, select the attachment icon (paperclip), and select the file you want to upload. This will allow your paper to be assessed by SafeAssign. Only add the Word document file. Do not include additional text in the textbox.
Your document file name should include the Course number Section number First initial Last name Module number Assignment type
For example, 101003SChestnutM3Essay
Only use letters and numbers in the file name. Do not use any punctuation or special characters.
Organization and Structure
Cover page. Failure to include a cover page can incur up to a 20% deduction.
Complete omission of an introduction or conclusion will incur a 25% deduction with a maximum deduction of 50% in the Organization rubric if both the introduction and conclusion are omitted. (This is only applicable for the complete omission of an introduction and conclusion. Scoring an incomplete introduction and conclusion is determined by the instructor based on the rubric.)
Sources (Notes (footnotes/endnotes) and Bibliography Section) 
At least three notes and a Bibliography are required to receive full credit in the Sources rubric.
Failure to provide any notes and a Bibliography will incur a 50% deduction in the Sources rubric.
Only providing one credible note or a Bibliography will incur a 25% deduction in the Sources rubric.
Only providing one credible note and a Bibliography will incur a 10% deduction in the Sources rubric.
Only providing two credible notes and a Bibliography will incur a 5% deduction in the Sources rubric.

Need help with assignments?

Our qualified writers can create original, plagiarism-free papers in any format you choose (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc.)

Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.

Click Here To Order Now