Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Information and Guidelines for School Counseling/Counseling
Video Summaries and
Information and Guidelines for School Counseling/Counseling
Video Summaries and Critiques
Students will select two online videos reflecting either (a) individual school counseling sessions with students or (b) individual clinical counseling sessions with youth of school age. The videos must have been posted within the last five years and be at least 20 minutes in length.
Students will write two (2) four – five-page summaries of the videos and with critiques of the counseling sessions – and especially – the interpersonal, communication, and helping skills demonstrated by the school counselors or counselors. The video titles, the dates on which they were posted, the names of the school counselors or counselors (if possible), and whether the videos are within video channels to which one can subscribe must be provided.
A discussion/conclusion section including student reflection, analysis, and critique is required for both summaries/critiques. A manageable way to approach this section of the assignments is to think in terms of a Venn diagram: Thesis (video content, and especially that of specific to the school counselors’ or counselors’ interpersonal, communication, and helping skills) contrasted and compared to antithesis (student’s knowledge, including research-based knowledge and practical/professional experience) and then synthesis.
The papers must be APA-formatted (i.e., title page, four to five pages of text, and references page [no Abstract required]) and word processed, spell-checked, proof-read, and edited prior to submission. Considerations for grading include: What were the student’s observations, reactions, and thoughts about the interpersonal, communication, and helping skills of the school counselors, counselors, and about the videos, overall? What were the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the school counselors, counselors, and videos? Were the videos summarized in a concise way? Were the videos written about with clarity of expression? Was there accurate grammar and spelling?
Emphasis will be extended to the below items when evaluating the paper:
evidence of focus
organization
clarity of expression
style
content
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.