Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
link to article being analysed: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosop
link to article being analysed: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/could-time-be-change/AC360900B59E70EB9C47316EE9E58DC9
PROMPT: Write an essay in which you:
a. Explain Shoemaker’s thought experiment allegedly showing that time can exist without change.
b. Present and explain at least one counter-argument to Shoemaker’s position from the Corish article.
c. Explain whether you ultimately agree or disagree with Shoemaker, and explain WHY you agree or disagree as you do.
You need to address all three of these tasks in your essay.
Purpose
This assignment addresses the following Course Learning Outcomes:
Apply philosophical theories to a specific issue.
Identify major points and arguments of an essay in philosophy.
The purpose of this assignment is to help you practice the following skills that are essential to your success in this course and beyond:
Demonstrating your ability to read and explain a philosophical argument.
Presenting contrasting points of view on a philosophical question.
Identify major points and arguments of an essay in philosophy.
Critically analyze and evaluate philosophical arguments.
Format
Your essay should be about 5-6 pages (double-spaced) not including title page and bibliography/references.
You may use any format for citations. (If you don’t already have your own procedure for generating citations, I highly recommend: https://www.citethisforme.com/)
Your essay should cite at least the article by Denis Corish.
You may (but do not have to) also cite the article by Shoemaker and the Carneades video explaining the Shoemaker thought experiment.
You do not have to cite any class notes.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.