Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Promt: In the last sentence of the last full chapter, Doudna and Sternberg conclude: “The power to control our specie’s genetic future is awesome and terrifying. Deciding how to handle it may be the biggest challenge we have ever faced. I hope—I believe—that we are up to the task.” Yet just four pages later in the Epilogue, the authors write: “That we are unprepared for such colossal responsibility, I have no doubt.”
Using specific concrete evidence and examples from the book (and page number cites) based on the broader history it provides of genetic engineering and CRISPR’s development and use to that point (roughly 2016), do you conclude the history thus far suggests we should be optimistic or pessimistic that humans have been capable of managing its power for “the good” while avoiding its misuse for “the bad”? What are some of the potential risks and benefits of CRISPR? Is it possible to have the benefits without the risks?
The only source for this paper should be Jennifer Doudna’s book “A Crack in Creation” I will provide you with a slide show of how you should go about writing style. other than that my biggest advice is that you make a good argument with solid evidence and answer what the prompt is asking by using evidence from the book from specific page numbers to back up your argument.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.