Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
the introduction should be on a separate page from the formal argument.
You appear to be misunderstanding how to write the introduction. You should only be discussing the formal argument in the second paragraph. So, you need to remove the references to the formal argument in the first paragraph.
You need a mini introduction and conclusion for all of your premises.
Especially when you introduce and conclude your premises, you need to make sure to talk about the premise and the overall argument. You need to do this throughout your premise discussion as well, but especially in the introduction and the conclusion of the premises.
For premise 1, your first piece of research is a case study. According to Chapter 7, a case example is considered weak research. It is a hasty generalization.
He stated that cancel culture targets mainly public figures. Research shows that most cancel culture victims are young, voiceless, financially vulnerable or don’t have a major platform on which to defend themselves.
You have a lot in your premise one discussion about one person. Again, this is a hasty generalization fallacy. You cannot say that the experience of one person applies to all people.
There is a lot of research out there regarding how council culture effects young people as a population group.
Your premise 1 is reading like a descriptive paper rather than an argumentative paper.
On page 6, you mentioned that the results of the study are not generalizable to the larger population because it is a small sample size of three. After you say this, you must have some good reasons for using it. Otherwise, it is not logical to keep it in your paper.
The chair is not an appropriate piece of research for this assignment. It would be appropriate for a descriptive paper, but not for an argumentative philosophical research paper.
You appear to be misunderstanding how to complete step number two. Step #2 involves looking at the research and methodologies used in the study you have chosen and then looking at chapters 7 and eight of the textbook and seeing if the research they used was good or bad according to the textbook. To be clear, I see you doing a little of this. I just don’t see a clear, full discussion period keep in mind that step #2 should be 25% of each premise discussion.
On your work cited page, proquest is not appropriate to put in a citation.
In your citations, you are missing the Internet locations
I have given you revision suggestions and some journal articles. You need to revise the paper I have written according to the revision suggestions, and then select the appropriate journal articles. The main thing is to revise, you don’t have to make me longer.
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.