Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
Therapeutic Relationship
Case 1Case 2
CasesJ.J is a nurse practitioner who work
Therapeutic Relationship
Case 1Case 2
CasesJ.J is a nurse practitioner who works in a primary care facility. He believes that one of the most important aspects of his work is to foster a therapeutic relationship with his clients. He is using effective communication techniques.
Many of his clients have altered sensory perception such as blindness and deafness. Because of these conditions, He has to be extremely patient with his clients. J.J. also finds that the use of respect and humor help him bond more readily with his clients.
T.D. enjoys caring for the children and young people in the schools where she works, but sometimes she is faced with tough situations such as suspected child abuse and neglect, teen pregnancy, and alcohol and drug use among teenagers. She works hard to ensure that the children in her schools receive the best care possible.
Questions for the caseFor better results with his clients, J.J must secure trust with his patients. Discuss strategies that promote trust between patients and health care providers.
Several third graders reports having received no breakfast at home for more than a week. T.D. is exercising Advocacy for the students under her care. What type of actions she might be doing to exercise advocacy for the students?
Choose one of the cases above and answer its respective question(s). And then, compose the items below for your case:
Moral distress is a frequent situation where health care providers should face. Please define and articulate a personal experience where you have faced Moral distress in your practice.
Explain how health promotion relates to morality.
Describe your insights about your own communication strengths and weaknesses. Identify situations in which it may be difficult for you to establish or terminate a therapeutic relationship.
Submission Instructions:
The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper is to be formatted per current APA, be clear, concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper is to be 3-4 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.
Complete and submit the assignment by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Essay/Paper Rubric
CriteriaRatings
Points
Identification of Main Issues/Problems
Distinguished – 4 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
Excellent – 3 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
Fair – 2 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
Poor – 1 point
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
No Submission – 0 points
4 points
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems
Distinguished – 4 points
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
Excellent – 3 points
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
Fair – 2 points
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
Poor – 1 point
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
No Submission – 0 points
4 points
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
Distinguished – 4 points
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
Excellent – 3 points
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
Fair – 2 points
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
Poor – 1 point
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
No Submission – 0 points
4 points
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
Distinguished – 4 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
Excellent – 3 points
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
Fair – 2 points
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
Poor – 1 point
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
No Submission – 0 points
4 points
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
Distinguished – 4 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
Excellent – 3 points
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Fair – 2 points
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 1 point
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
No Submission – 0 points
4 points
Essay/Paper Rubric
Essay/Paper Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Main Issues/Problems
4 ptsDistinguished
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems.
3 ptsExcellent
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems.
2 ptsFair
Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
1 ptsPoor
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems.
0 ptsNo Submission
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis and Evaluation of Issues/Probelms
4 ptsDistinguished
Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
3 ptsExcellent
Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems.
2 ptsFair
Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
1 ptsPoor
Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems.
0 ptsNo Submission
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates a Conceptual Understanding
4 ptsDistinguished
Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding.
3 ptsExcellent
Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
2 ptsFair
Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
1 ptsPoor
Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding.
0 ptsNo Submission
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature
4 ptsDistinguished
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing.
3 ptsExcellent
Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
2 ptsFair
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing.
1 ptsPoor
Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing.
0 ptsNo Submission
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
4 ptsFull Marks
Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors.
3 ptsExcellent
Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
2 ptsFair
Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
1 ptsPoor
Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention.
0 ptsNo Submission
4 pts
Total Points: 20
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.