Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete th
You are required to cite a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the past 5 years, appropriate for the assignment criteria, and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric CriteriaCollapse All Rubric CriteriaCollapse All
Assessment18 points
Criteria DescriptionSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient.
5. Target18 pointsSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is thorough.
4. Acceptable16.02 pointsSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient, is detailed.
3. Approaching14.22 pointsSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is present.
2. Insufficient13.5 pointsSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsSummary of the relevant data obtained during assessment about the patient’s health status, including physical, psychological, sociocultural, spiritual, and economic factors that are affecting the patient is omitted.
Diagnosis: Part 19 points
Criteria DescriptionDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient.
5. Target9 pointsDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is thorough.
4. Acceptable8.01 pointsDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is detailed.
3. Approaching7.11 pointsDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is present.
2. Insufficient6.75 pointsDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDetermination of two components of the Developmental Assets that need to be addressed for this patient is omitted.
Diagnosis: Part 29 points
Criteria DescriptionDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components.
5. Target9 pointsDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is thorough.
4. Acceptable8.01 pointsDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is detailed.
3. Approaching7.11 pointsDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is present.
2. Insufficient6.75 pointsDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDefinition of two components selected and explanation of rationale for selecting the two components is omitted.
Planning: Part 18 points
Criteria DescriptionCreation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs.
5. Target8 pointsCreation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is thorough.
4. Acceptable7.12 pointsCreation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs, is detailed.
3. Approaching6.32 pointsCreation of plan of care for patient taking into account their health problems and needs is present.
2. Insufficient6 pointsCreation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsCreation of plan of care for patient, taking into account their health problems and needs is omitted.
Planning: Part 28 points
Criteria DescriptionDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion.
5. Target8 pointsDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is thorough.
4. Acceptable7.12 pointsDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion, is detailed.
3. Approaching6.32 pointsDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is present.
2. Insufficient6 pointsDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDescription of how each of the two components of the Developmental Assets identified above would be addressed, including specific examples in recommendations and discussion is omitted.
Planning: Part 38 points
Criteria DescriptionProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components.
5. Target8 pointsProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is thorough.
4. Acceptable7.12 pointsProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is detailed.
3. Approaching6.32 pointsProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is present.
2. Insufficient6 pointsProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsProvision of at least one community resource for each of the selected Developmental Assets components is omitted.
Planning: Part 48 points
Criteria DescriptionDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care.
5. Target8 pointsDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is thorough.
4. Acceptable7.12 pointsDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is detailed.
3. Approaching6.32 pointsDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is present.
2. Insufficient6 pointsDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDiscussion of how cultural or religious beliefs may impact the plan of care is omitted.
Implementation11 points
Criteria DescriptionDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care
5. Target11 pointsDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is thorough.
4. Acceptable9.79 pointsDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is detailed.
3. Approaching8.69 pointsDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is present.
2. Insufficient8.25 pointsDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsDiscussion of how the four metaparadigm concepts (person, environment, health, and nursing) support the implementation of plan of care is omitted.
Evaluation11 points
Criteria DescriptionExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective.
5. Target11 pointsExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is thorough.
4. Acceptable9.79 pointsExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is detailed.
3. Approaching8.69 pointsExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is present.
2. Insufficient8.25 pointsExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is lacking detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsExplanation of how the implementation of the plan of care would be evaluated to determine if it was effective is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing5 points
Criteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target5 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable4.45 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching3.95 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient3.75 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
Format/Documentation5 points
Criteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target5 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.
4. Acceptable4.45 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching3.95 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient3.75 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
Total100 points
© 2024. Grand Canyon University. All Rights
Order from us for quality, customized work in due time of your choice.